A couple years ago, when I was talking about House Of Lords' previous 
album, I was musing on how they were a band that always made solid 
music, but I was never in a rush to listen to them. Several albums had 
slipped past me, and I didn't care. That was changed
 with "Indestructible", which was a powerhouse album that I still go 
back to. It not only made me rethink my opinion of House Of Lords, but 
it made their next album appointment listening, to see if they could 
keep up that momentum, or if it was a fleeting moment
 in the sun.
We are now at that judgment day.
Things get off to a good star with "Harlequin". After a frustrating wait
 for the build-up to finish, the song itself is classic House Of Lords, 
melodic rock with James Christian's hook carrying the day. The 
production is a bit more polished than last time out,
 but stops short of being the hyper-glossy sound that makes many AOR 
bands unappealing to me. House Of Lords still sounds like a rock band.
By the middle of the record, we get to the same problem I had with the 
previous album; House Of Lords occasionally tries to write a song 
heavier than they are as a band, and it doesn't work. In this case, it's
 the title track, which is let down first of all
 by the guitars not being heavy enough for the riff they're trying to 
get across, but more by the chorus, which can't fit a smooth melody into
 the space given for the vocals. It's more aggressive, and less 
interesting.
House Of Lords is better at the first word of 'melodic rock', and it 
shows. When they don't worry about trying to be heavy, they make 
fantastic music. As I already mentioned, "Harlequin" is a great song, 
and the ballad "The Sun Will Never Set Again" is also
 top-notch. They aren't fluff, so I can't understand the need to try to 
up the heaviness here and there to a degree the band just isn't capable 
of. It's better to work to your strengths.
That would make this still a good album, if they were able to hit their 
marks. "Reign Of Fire" is a pretty bad track, and while "Hit The Wall" 
does make an impact, it does so in a way I find annoying instead of 
memorable. This is the same issues I've had with
 House Of Lords before. They are not at all consistent when it comes to 
songwriting. There will be four or five amazing tracks on an album, and 
then another three that leave me scratching my head that it's the same 
band. That holds true here as well. There's
 half of this album that is really good stuff. The other half is either 
boring or disappointingly mediocre.
That leaves me to say that "Saint Of The Lost Souls" is merely a decent 
album, and is certainly not as good as "Indestructible" was. That album 
was fantastic, and this one makes me want to pull that one out again.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment