What is rock and roll anymore? It's a question I often ask myself, since
there doesn't seem to be an easy answer. If you listen to the radio,
rock is anything that has even one real instrument playing the music. If
you pay attention to some other places, rock
is all about being a testosterone-flooded neanderthal who can't form a
complete sentence without cursing. And then there's the attitude that
rock never evolved past 1979. We lose sight of this, but perhaps the
reason we find so few good rock bands these days
is that we no longer even know what one is supposed to be.
Sister's answer to the question is to try to fuse a couple of the
options together. They take the sleazy Sunset Strip sound, and pump it
up to modern levels of heaviness and aggression. With snarled vocals and
overdriven guitars, they border on being a metal
band, but there's a focus on giving every song a strong melodic chorus
to raise your horns to, which feels like a throwback to the 80s. Just
listen to "Carved In Stone", and the appeal of Sister is clear. The riff
has swagger, and despite the vocals veering
from sneering to almost growling, the hook is absolutely irresistible.
It also sounds a bit like something that Avenged Sevenfold would write,
if they weren't concerned with thinking of themselves as the saviors of
the world.
Sister's dedication to making sure rock maintains within spitting
distance of the mainstream is something to be commended. Focusing on
having songs with strong hooks is not just a way to broaden your own
appeal, but a way to retrain our attention on what rock
music used to be, and as such why it is no longer popular with the
masses.
That sounds like I'm putting a lot of faith in Sister, but let's take a
step back here. While I'm commending their approach to rock and roll,
the fact of the matter is that the record doesn't live up to those lofty
ideals. There's plenty of good music that
is enjoyable enough, but there are also problems that keep the record
from being what it should be. First is the writing, which doesn't
deliver sharp enough hooks. There is certainly an attempt to make every
song memorable, but not enough of them follow through.
Secondly, and most grating, are the vocals. The insistence on snarling
through gritted teeth through most of the songs is a huge mistake. Those
kind of vocals are difficult to swallow all the time, and sound
completely absurd when done over a lone acoustic
guitar passage. You can't take it seriously.
So what I have to say is that Sister is another band to throw on the
growing pile of young guns who have a solid idea of how to do something
compelling, if not always completely original. There is plenty of
promise here for them to make the kind of rock music
that can cross over a bit and become successful. The problem is that
they have the idea, but not quite the skills to get there. Maybe they'll
get there someday, and I hope they do, but right now Sister is still
falling a bit short of being appointment listening.
No comments:
Post a Comment