A couple years ago, when I was talking about House Of Lords' previous
album, I was musing on how they were a band that always made solid
music, but I was never in a rush to listen to them. Several albums had
slipped past me, and I didn't care. That was changed
with "Indestructible", which was a powerhouse album that I still go
back to. It not only made me rethink my opinion of House Of Lords, but
it made their next album appointment listening, to see if they could
keep up that momentum, or if it was a fleeting moment
in the sun.
We are now at that judgment day.
Things get off to a good star with "Harlequin". After a frustrating wait
for the build-up to finish, the song itself is classic House Of Lords,
melodic rock with James Christian's hook carrying the day. The
production is a bit more polished than last time out,
but stops short of being the hyper-glossy sound that makes many AOR
bands unappealing to me. House Of Lords still sounds like a rock band.
By the middle of the record, we get to the same problem I had with the
previous album; House Of Lords occasionally tries to write a song
heavier than they are as a band, and it doesn't work. In this case, it's
the title track, which is let down first of all
by the guitars not being heavy enough for the riff they're trying to
get across, but more by the chorus, which can't fit a smooth melody into
the space given for the vocals. It's more aggressive, and less
interesting.
House Of Lords is better at the first word of 'melodic rock', and it
shows. When they don't worry about trying to be heavy, they make
fantastic music. As I already mentioned, "Harlequin" is a great song,
and the ballad "The Sun Will Never Set Again" is also
top-notch. They aren't fluff, so I can't understand the need to try to
up the heaviness here and there to a degree the band just isn't capable
of. It's better to work to your strengths.
That would make this still a good album, if they were able to hit their
marks. "Reign Of Fire" is a pretty bad track, and while "Hit The Wall"
does make an impact, it does so in a way I find annoying instead of
memorable. This is the same issues I've had with
House Of Lords before. They are not at all consistent when it comes to
songwriting. There will be four or five amazing tracks on an album, and
then another three that leave me scratching my head that it's the same
band. That holds true here as well. There's
half of this album that is really good stuff. The other half is either
boring or disappointingly mediocre.
That leaves me to say that "Saint Of The Lost Souls" is merely a decent
album, and is certainly not as good as "Indestructible" was. That album
was fantastic, and this one makes me want to pull that one out again.
No comments:
Post a Comment